Hiveram

The system of record for AI work.

Your gate already has a verdict. Where is the record of it?

For source-code review and security-gate teams.

Your team decides whether other people’s code is allowed through. Hiveram keeps the record of those decisions: each verdict tied to the change it judged, each exception tied to the person who accepted it, and each closure tied to its evidence.

What does the gate look like from the inside?

We run static analysis on every change, dependency scanning on every build, image signing before release and admission policy at the cluster. We produce an SBOM because someone will ask for it. Each of those tools gives a verdict, and each verdict lands somewhere different.

A scanner report sits in one place, a pipeline log in another, a comment on a ticket in a third. A waiver is a chat message from whoever was on call that week. Nobody wrote down why the change existed in the first place, because the tools never asked.

Then an auditor asks which check ran on which commit, and who accepted the exception. The answer is a search, followed by a conversation with someone who remembers.

The tools judge well. What is missing is the record of the judgement.

What does the record add?

Hiveram does not run your checks or replace your tools. It keeps the record the verdicts belong to. The record is structured like this:

1. One work order per change. The change your gate reviews has a record that states what it was meant to do and who asked for it, written before the code.
2. Verdicts attached as evidence. Each check result is attached to that work order with the check name, the commit it ran on, the result, the time, and who or what ran it.
3. Waivers as decisions. An exception is a recorded decision with an identity and a reason, on the same work order, not a message someone has to find later.
4. Closure that checks the evidence. Closure is refused when the checks on the cited commit are not green, or when the identity closing the work is the one that did it.
5. The chain, afterwards. Change, verdicts, waivers and closure stay connected as one record you can read after the fact.

The auditor’s question then has one place to start. Open the work order for the change, and the verdicts, the exceptions and the closure are on it.

What is supported today?

A page listing exactly what is supported today, and what is not, is coming. Until it is published, ask us about your own setup before you rely on any part of this page.

What changes when AI writes the code?

When AI starts writing the code the gate reviews, the record is what tells the gate who asked for the change.

A scanner can say a commit is clean. It cannot say whether anyone authorised the agent to write it. In Hiveram the agent works on a work order that states its intent, and it cannot close its own work. Why Hiveram answers the same questions for governance and audit leads.